📌 Overview
This post documents a New York session trade on the NASDAQ 100 Index, executed on April 24, 2026.
The setup followed a liquidity-based continuation model, focusing on:
- Sell-side liquidity sweep
- Displacement
- Pullback entry
- Expansion toward highs
🧭 Market Context
Before the trade, the market had:
- Formed a consolidation range (accumulation)
- Swept sell-side liquidity below the range (marked $$ on chart)
- Shown bullish recovery with structure shift
This created a clear expectation:
👉 Continuation toward previous highs / premium liquidity
🎯 Trade Bias
The bias for this session was bullish, based on:
- Liquidity sweep (below range)
- Strong bullish displacement
- Formation of higher lows
- Respect of demand zone (highlighted area)
👉 Market structure confirmed buyers were in control.
⚙️ Execution Model (ICT Framework)
The trade followed a simple model:
Liquidity Sweep → Displacement → Pullback → Continuation
Entry conditions:
- Sell-side liquidity taken
- Strong displacement upward
- Pullback into imbalance / demand zone
This provided a high-probability continuation setup.
⏰ Timing & Execution Window
The trade was executed during the New York session between 10:30 AM and 10:45 AM (NY time).
This timing is significant because:
- Initial liquidity had already been cleared
- Market began showing true directional intent after 10:30 AM
- Volatility increased, allowing cleaner expansion
👉 In many cases, indices deliver the real move after 10:30 AM NY
📍 Entry & Confirmation
Entry was taken after:
- Price returned to the demand zone (blue area)
- Market showed bullish reaction and continuation structure
Confirmation included:
- Strong bullish candles
- Respect of support
- Break of short-term structure
🚀 Trade Outcome
Price moved as expected and:
- Continued upward aggressively
- Broke prior structure
- Reached toward all-time high liquidity (marked on chart)
👉 Clean execution with strong directional follow-through.
🧠 Trade Review
✔ Strengths
- Clear directional bias before entry
- Patience after liquidity sweep
- Entry taken at discount area
- Alignment with NY session timing
⚠️ Improvements
- Entry could be refined further on lower timeframe (M1 precision)
- Additional confirmation around micro structure could improve risk efficiency
🔑 Key Takeaway
This trade reinforces an important concept:
👉 Liquidity sweep alone is not enough
👉 Real confirmation comes from displacement and structure shift
High-probability setups occur when:
- Liquidity is taken
- Market shows intent
- Price offers a pullback entry
📌 Conclusion
This was a high-probability NY session continuation trade, driven by:
- Liquidity engineering
- Institutional order flow
- Proper timing execution
The combination of structure + liquidity + timing provided a clean and repeatable setup.
⚠️ Disclaimer:
This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results.
I currently use the prop firm below for my trading and evaluations.
It aligns well with my NY session approach and execution style.
If you want to explore it further, you can check it below:
FundingPips — Prop Firm
Used in my live trading & evaluations
Used for analysis, structure, and execution planning
){kind=link}
0 Comments